Thread 'Let's talk politics'

Message boards : The Lounge : Let's talk politics
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 16 · 17 · 18 · 19 · 20 · 21 · 22 · Next

AuthorMessage
ProfileJord
Project administrator
Help desk expert
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Aug 05
Posts: 15866
Netherlands
Message 117658 - Posted: 7 Dec 2025, 18:42:52 UTC

ID: 117658 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileDave
Help desk expert

Send message
Joined: 28 Jun 10
Posts: 3256
United Kingdom
Message 117672 - Posted: 10 Dec 2025, 18:09:13 UTC - in response to Message 117658.  

And US is proposing details should be given of all social media accounts used in last five years to get a tourist visa.
ID: 117672 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileJord
Project administrator
Help desk expert
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Aug 05
Posts: 15866
Netherlands
Message 117674 - Posted: 10 Dec 2025, 21:50:58 UTC

Well, at least this one isn't about what it says it in the socials, that someone might be offended. It's about fire safety. It's been done here in the NL as well, even in my own stairwell.

https://www.lbc.co.uk/article/killjoy-council-bans-christmas-door-wreaths-and-threatens-to-fine-those-who-leav-5HjdPBj_2/

In response, the council said: "We understand this can feel frustrating, especially at Christmas, but communal areas in our blocks of flats, including hallways, stairwells, and doors in enclosed spaces must be kept clear and fire doors must be untampered with for fire safety.

"This is a government requirement, was agreed with residents, is part of tenancy agreements and helps keep escape routes unobstructed and prevents damage to fire doors which keep people safe.
ID: 117674 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileJord
Project administrator
Help desk expert
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Aug 05
Posts: 15866
Netherlands
Message 117675 - Posted: 10 Dec 2025, 22:26:26 UTC

Then again...

A pensioner was hit with a £250 fine by overzealous litter wardens for spitting out a leaf that blew into his mouth.

Roy Marsh, 86, was slapped with the ridiculous ticket after the incident while out walking in a seaside town.

The pensioner said he was accosted by two council enforcement officers after pausing for a rest near some reeds on a windy day in Skegness, Lincolnshire, earlier this year.

'As I was sitting there, a gale blew a big reed into my mouth. I spat it out and just as I got up to walk away two guys (enforcement officers) came up to me,' he said.

Mr Marsh was told by one of the officers at the South Parade Car Park in the town that he had been seen spitting on the floor. He claimed he told the officer he was being a 'silly boy'.

'It was all unnecessary and all out of proportion.' Mr Marsh added.

A fine of £250 was issued after the incident in February, which was later reduced on appeal to £150, which Mr Marsh, who lives in the town, paid.

'It was something that could have happened to anyone,' he said. 'It's left me anxious about going out.'
ID: 117675 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileDave
Help desk expert

Send message
Joined: 28 Jun 10
Posts: 3256
United Kingdom
Message 117694 - Posted: 12 Dec 2025, 10:52:13 UTC - in response to Message 117675.  

That last one beggars belief. Firstly, the council workers should have applied discretion at the scene. There must have been others who could have done so at a later stage too. Interesting to see some of the madness happening where there are Right wing councils and some where they are on the left. I am not sure how much your last example is about those representing the citizens locally and how much is about a lack of common sense among council workers.
ID: 117694 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileDave
Help desk expert

Send message
Joined: 28 Jun 10
Posts: 3256
United Kingdom
Message 118029 - Posted: 10 Jan 2026, 13:43:14 UTC

So, Musk has decided that it is OK for those paying him money to use his tools for making and publishing abusive images of women and minors. I deleted my twitter/X account when he bought the platform. His latest lack of regard for those wronged on the platform confirms I will never return to the platform while he owns it.
ID: 118029 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileJord
Project administrator
Help desk expert
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Aug 05
Posts: 15866
Netherlands
Message 118033 - Posted: 10 Jan 2026, 17:53:32 UTC - in response to Message 118029.  

From that same X, posted by a woman:

So what if Grok can put people in bikinis?

So can photoshop? So can millions of apps already?

This isn’t a new problem, it’s a new tool.

If a user does it someone unconsentually, the user should be punished, not the platform.
https://x.com/i/status/2009539628445941851
ID: 118033 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileJord
Project administrator
Help desk expert
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Aug 05
Posts: 15866
Netherlands
Message 118035 - Posted: 10 Jan 2026, 19:23:32 UTC - in response to Message 118033.  

ChatGPT and Gemini will make the same images but they aren't mentioned as being spawn of the devil or that it's time for Ofcom to block those.

https://x.com/i/status/2009684469188546967
ID: 118035 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileJord
Project administrator
Help desk expert
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Aug 05
Posts: 15866
Netherlands
Message 118037 - Posted: 10 Jan 2026, 20:44:21 UTC

The UK confirmed its plan to end private messaging.

Ofcom is now being handed power to scan encrypted chats under the Online Safety Act. They’re calling it “client-side scanning.” What it means: every message on your phone gets checked before it’s encrypted.

This isn’t safety. It’s surveillance.

Grok:
The UK's Online Safety Act empowers Ofcom to require tech firms to use "accredited technology" like client-side scanning for detecting illegal content in encrypted messages, targeting child abuse and terrorism. A Jan 7, 2026, House of Lords debate confirmed an April 2026 timeline for action, per Lord Hanson's statement. Critics view it as surveillance; supporters emphasize safety. Sources: UK Parliament Hansard, Ofcom updates.
ID: 118037 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileJord
Project administrator
Help desk expert
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Aug 05
Posts: 15866
Netherlands
Message 118041 - Posted: 11 Jan 2026, 8:24:35 UTC

Laila Cunningham wrote:
I have had more abuse on this platform than anywhere else but I still oppose any attempt by government to ban or control X. It is not their job to protect us from opinions. Free speech means just that, free.
Censorship only protects those in power who have something to hide. And that is exactly why they want X silenced. And that is exactly why it must not.
https://x.com/i/status/2010032306858115125
ID: 118041 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileDave
Help desk expert

Send message
Joined: 28 Jun 10
Posts: 3256
United Kingdom
Message 118043 - Posted: 11 Jan 2026, 9:32:17 UTC - in response to Message 118033.  

If a user does it someone unconsentually, the user should be punished, not the platform.
When said platform has the ability to take down such images and refuses to do so, then the platform should also be punished.

I suspect we are never going to agree on this and there is far more about Musk than just this issue which means I will not use any platform owned by him. (Not that he will ever notice my absence!)
ID: 118043 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileJord
Project administrator
Help desk expert
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Aug 05
Posts: 15866
Netherlands
Message 118045 - Posted: 11 Jan 2026, 14:12:58 UTC - in response to Message 118043.  

In reply to Dave's message of 11 Jan 2026:
If a user does it someone unconsentually, the user should be punished, not the platform.
When said platform has the ability to take down such images and refuses to do so, then the platform should also be punished.
Then punish all search engines, all image hosting sites, all porn sites. Know what? Just punish all of the internet. But that's exactly what your government and the EU are trying to do with their Online Safety Act and Digital Services Act laws. This isn't about protecting women and children. Do you know it may even make it more difficult for those women and children to find someone who listens to them, when you disable all the free speech social media platforms and have them monitored by... by whom even?

In your country kids aren't even allowed anymore to wonder out loud about illegal immigration, because then their school will put them into a mandatory anti-terrorism programme.

A state-funded computer game is warning teenagers that they risk being referred to a counter-terrorism programme if they question mass migration. Pathways is an interactive game designed for 11- to 18-year-old pupils and funded by Prevent, a Home Office programme for tackling extremism.

An in-game meter monitors how extreme the character’s behaviour is. Those who “lose” may be given counselling to deal with “ideological thoughts” or referred to an anti-terrorism expert.


https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/01/09/prevent-video-game-extremist/

Also look at how the character Charlie is addressed: as they, not as he or him.
ID: 118045 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileDave
Help desk expert

Send message
Joined: 28 Jun 10
Posts: 3256
United Kingdom
Message 118046 - Posted: 11 Jan 2026, 14:53:05 UTC - in response to Message 118045.  

Also look at how the character Charlie is addressed: as they, not as he or him.
On gender identity we may be a tad closer than on free speech. I have long likened a man identifying as a woman to a white person self identifying as black. I understand the logic of your position. I just happen not to agree with it.
ID: 118046 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
W-K ID 666

Send message
Joined: 30 Dec 05
Posts: 507
United Kingdom
Message 118047 - Posted: 11 Jan 2026, 15:54:18 UTC

If you are buried when you die, and in a hundred years they dig up your bones. The sciatic notch and brow furrows can only determine your biological sex.
ID: 118047 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileDave
Help desk expert

Send message
Joined: 28 Jun 10
Posts: 3256
United Kingdom
Message 118053 - Posted: 12 Jan 2026, 10:32:15 UTC
Last modified: 12 Jan 2026, 10:35:49 UTC

An interesting statistic relevant to Musk's description of UK as a police state.
Number of people shot dead by police in 24/25 in UK: 2.
Number of people shot dead by police in 24/25 in US:1280
Edit: that makes the US figure about 128 times as many per head of population.
ID: 118053 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileJord
Project administrator
Help desk expert
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Aug 05
Posts: 15866
Netherlands
Message 118056 - Posted: 12 Jan 2026, 16:49:47 UTC - in response to Message 118046.  

In reply to Dave's message of 11 Jan 2026:
I understand the logic of your position. I just happen not to agree with it.
These are kids 11-18 that are indoctrinated this way, make normal what may not be normal. It's okay for us to determine for ourselves that this is right or wrong, but it's not when you're in your formative years.
ID: 118056 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileJord
Project administrator
Help desk expert
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Aug 05
Posts: 15866
Netherlands
Message 118057 - Posted: 12 Jan 2026, 16:56:39 UTC - in response to Message 118053.  

In reply to Dave's message of 12 Jan 2026:
An interesting statistic relevant to Musk's description of UK as a police state.
It was about people being arrested for posting things on social media, their thoughts on active news items. That number is then posted as 12,800 or so, but I asked Grok about it, and she says that's the number of total arrests made in the UK in 2023, with no distinction between why these people were arrested. Most weren't convicted anyway.
ID: 118057 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileDave
Help desk expert

Send message
Joined: 28 Jun 10
Posts: 3256
United Kingdom
Message 118059 - Posted: 12 Jan 2026, 17:28:27 UTC - in response to Message 118057.  

I am more worried about people being shot by police than them being arrested for what they put on social media. At the same time, many of the arrests I have read about should never have been made. I would guess that the ones that are clearly ridiculous are more likely to make the front pages of newspapers.
ID: 118059 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileDave
Help desk expert

Send message
Joined: 28 Jun 10
Posts: 3256
United Kingdom
Message 118060 - Posted: 12 Jan 2026, 17:40:52 UTC - in response to Message 118056.  

These are kids 11-18 that are indoctrinated this way, make normal what may not be normal. It's okay for us to determine for ourselves that this is right or wrong, but it's not when you're in your formative years.


I don't know what happens in other countries on the gender thing. I have only known one woman (eighteen at the time) well who wanted to transition to be a man. She was on the waiting list for the gender identity clinic when she took her own life. I have known a number of men who have transitioned but all after the age of eighteen. When working as a mental health nurse in in-patient adolescent units, I came across both young men and women who wanted to transition and in every case, our advice as professionals was to sort out the other issues they were admitted for first and only then think about whether they still wanted to transition or not. The overwhelming majority who worked through the other issues did not still want to transition. The biggest problem is lack of mental health professionals to help young people deal with the other issues.
ID: 118060 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileJord
Project administrator
Help desk expert
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Aug 05
Posts: 15866
Netherlands
Message 118085 - Posted: 15 Jan 2026, 0:01:56 UTC
Last modified: 15 Jan 2026, 0:02:51 UTC

Going well, UK.

Four million people are to be denied the vote in May’s local elections in a “disgraceful attack on democracy” by Labour.

The Government is expected to cancel at least 27 council elections, meaning hundreds of councillors will avoid the risk of being voted out.
...
The Government claims that it needs to give some councils the option of delaying elections because they are facing major restructuring under a programme to abolish some district councils and introduce mayoralties.

But the independent watchdog, the Electoral Commission, has suggested this does not constitute the sort of “exceptional circumstance” that would justify postponement.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2026/01/14/may-elections-council-cancelled-local-government-act/
ID: 118085 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Previous · 1 . . . 16 · 17 · 18 · 19 · 20 · 21 · 22 · Next

Message boards : The Lounge : Let's talk politics

Copyright © 2026 University of California.
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.